ED vs I-PAC standoff escalates: Mamata’s ‘file seizure’ row lands in Calcutta High Court
Kolkata/IBNS: The political storm surrounding Enforcement Directorate (ED) raids at locations linked to election strategist group I-PAC has now reached the Calcutta High Court.
Both the ED and I-PAC have filed separate petitions after the central economic intelligence agency accused West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee of forcibly removing documents during the searches.
The high-profile confrontation unfolded on Thursday in Kolkata, triggering sharp political reactions.
While the ED insists the raids are part of a money laundering probe tied to the Bengal coal scam, I-PAC has moved court seeking a stay on the searches, arguing they are politically motivated ahead of upcoming elections.
ED claims ‘forcible removal’ of evidence
In its petition, the ED accused Mamata Banerjee and her aides of obstructing an official investigation.
According to the agency, searches at the residence of I-PAC head Prateek Jain and the group’s office were proceeding smoothly until the Chief Minister arrived with a large police contingent.
The agency alleged that Mamata entered Jain’s residence and removed crucial physical documents and electronic devices.
Visuals from the scene showed a visibly agitated Chief Minister walking out carrying a bulky green file, which the ED claims contained important evidence.
CM Mamata Banerjee was seen walking out carrying a bulky green file, which the ED claims contained important evidence. Photo: IBNS
The agency further stated that senior police officers, including Kolkata’s police chief and deputy commissioner of South Kolkata, reached the spot to verify the identity of ED officials following the confrontation.
Mamata calls raids ‘politically motivated’
Addressing the media, Mamata Banerjee dismissed the raids as politically driven and claimed they were meant to steal sensitive data related to her party’s election strategy and candidate selection for the 2026 polls.
Banerjee alleged that the action was orchestrated at the behest of Union Home Minister Amit Shah.
The Chief Minister later visited I-PAC’s office in Salt Lake, where she staged a sit-in protest.
According to the ED, Mamata and her aides once again removed documents and electronic devices from the office premises, which the agency says amounts to obstruction under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
Counter allegations and police complaint
Adding another twist, Prateek Jain’s family filed a police complaint accusing ED officials of stealing important documents during the raids.
I-PAC, founded by poll strategist-turned-politician Prashant Kishor, has approached the High Court seeking a halt to the searches, citing alleged misuse of central agencies.
Meanwhile, the Trinamool Congress announced a large protest march in response to what it called “political vendetta” by the Centre.
Why ED is probing I-PAC
The ED maintains that the raids are not politically targeted but linked to a money laundering investigation tied to the multi-crore Bengal coal scam.
The agency claims proceeds of crime worth around Rs 10 crore were allegedly routed to I-PAC through hawala channels.
According to ED sources, the money was allegedly paid on behalf of the Trinamool Congress for consultancy services during the party’s 2022 Goa Assembly election campaign.
The case traces back to a CBI FIR registered in November 2020 against coal smuggling kingpin Anup Majhi and others.
Majhi is accused of running a massive coal smuggling syndicate operating from Eastern Coalfields Limited lease areas in Asansol.
Investigators allege the syndicate illegally excavated coal and sold it to factories across multiple Bengal districts.
A portion of the illicit coal, the ED claims, was sold to companies linked to the Shakambhari Group, with proceeds allegedly funnelled to political entities.
High Court to hear crucial pleas
With both the ED and I-PAC approaching the Calcutta High Court, the case has now taken a significant legal turn.
The court is expected to hear arguments on whether the raids were lawful and whether Mamata Banerjee’s actions constituted obstruction.
IBNS
Senior Staff Reporter at Northeast Herald, covering news from Tripura and Northeast India.
Related Articles

Supreme Court allows first-ever passive euthanasia for 32-year-old man in coma for 13 years
New Delhi/IBNS: In a landmark judgement, the Supreme Court of India on Wednesday permitted the withdrawal of life support for a 32-year-old man who has remained in a vegetative state for 13 years following an accident.

LPG crisis hits metros: Commercial cylinder shortage triggers panic as govt prioritises domestic supply
New Delhi/IBNS: Panic gripped several metro cities, including the national capital New Delhi, as customers started worrying about the availability of commercial LPG and LNG amid fears of supply shortages triggered by the escalating West Asia conflict, media reports said.

As Iran-US war disrupts global gas supply, India issues guidelines to manage shortages
The ongoing war between Iran and the United States in the Middle East has disrupted the global supply of natural gas, with the Strait of Hormuz remaining a conflict zone for over two weeks.

Mumbai dentistry student dies by suicide, note alleges mental harassment by boyfriend
A 24-year-old postgraduate dentistry student allegedly died by suicide at her home in Mumbai’s Antop Hill area, with a suicide note indicating that she had been facing mental harassment from her boyfriend, media reports said.
Latest News

Yale study reveals hidden cause of childhood obesity—And it’s not just junk food

Meta buys AI-only social network Moltbook—A platform where bots talk to bots

Ram Charan’s RC17 delayed? Sukumar’s team finally breaks silence

This ex-Indian cricketer believes Sanju Samson can be next T20 skipper

